Over the years, our way of life has significantly improved and transitioned from being tightly knit in a close-minded society to a now, open-minded one. This, in turn, is what made our country great in a sense we can perfectly coexist with different kinds of people despite our differences in beliefs and culture.

Despite this promising progression, recent events have destabilized this peaceful coexistence, threatening our country’s core value of unity in diversity. With this in mind, we need to know how to get our country back on the right track to protect and preserve the principles our ancestors established for us in prior generations.

How we serve our country usually reflects how a country can develop, and if my contribution towards my country is deemed to be selfish and all other citizens think the same, then we may be in big trouble.

Getting Our Country Back On The Right Track: How Can A Country Develop?

How we serve our country can ultimately determine how to get our country back on the right track or on the wrong one. Learning how a country can develop today may seem challenging, but, you can help get our country back on the right track by looking into our history.

Mistakes made in the past have been recorded and written in books, hoping the same mistakes won’t happen again in the future. We should learn from past mistakes and move forward so that we can develop a country which is fair with liberty and justice to get our country back on the right track. Here are some tips you can follow to help navigate our country to the right direction:

1. Empower all people. Men, Women, Ethnic Groups and other citizens should be empowered.

2. Educate the citizens. Education is the cure of ignorance which can help us prevent heading towards destruction.

3. Allocate resources fairly.

These are some steps we can follow to get our country back on the right track. Politically speaking, our endeavors can be catalyzed if we get the support from our leaders through reforms which can help start a better movement of ideas.

How We Serve Our Country Can Steer The Direction Of Our Path

As mentioned earlier, how we serve our country can steer us towards either the right path or towards the wrong one. Everything we do for our country, no matter how small it is, can ultimately accumulate and impact how we will fare.

For one, electing a leader who is an expert at finance, law and the Constitution can help us put order back to our country. Capable leaders find ways to instill in your mind everything you do for the country can affect its overall performance. Leaders who inspire the minds of the people can surely become good navigators to place our country back on the right track.

My Contribution Towards My Country

As mentioned earlier, what you do today can impact our country tomorrow. My contribution towards my country should help my country bounce back on the right track. The spirit of volunteerism can ultimately contribute to our country’s overall development, so we better finish what we start and cross the finish line.

Let’s choose the right leaders to help us navigate the track to develop it into a better one tomorrow.

The progress that our country is experiencing can be attributed how our leaders saw the problems that we are facing and chose to take action to solve the problem at the best of their abilities. While this has been proven to be beneficial in a sense that leaders are maximizing their efforts for our country, they sometimes fail to recognize that the number of terms that they spent in office may have already taken so long because there is currently no congressional term limits being imposed.

Under the current constitutional by-laws, only the president has a 2-term limit in office, while the Senate, the Congress, and the Supreme Court, can run multiple terms and can hold public offices as long as they have been rightfully elected. While having unlimited terms has its advantages, it also has a fair share of disadvantages.

We should always consider the limits for a term for Congress pros and cons and try to see if the advantages of limits for a term in government outweigh the disadvantages. Keep in mind why should Congress have limits for a term, and see if a constitutional amendment can help all states in the country.

Why Should Congress Have Term Limits?

As mentioned earlier, an amendment of the constitution regarding term limits in Congress could be helpful. For one, many politicians turn their public office positions into their career and in consequence, they get distracted from serving people because they get distracted with amassing campaign funds instead of projects for their respective states.

Since public officials beginning at the Senate down to the Congress do not impose term limits in Congress their time to hold public office positions become unlimited in fact, the longest term holder recorded in the U.S. has held onto his position for over 53 years. At this rate, many members both from the Congress and the Senate filed a petition for limits for a term in Congress, aimed at amending the current ruling of the constitution towards it. Despite their efforts, these attempts have been deemed futile given that the Senators and the Congress members are not united in their stand towards this issue. The importance of understanding why Congress should have limits in term have consequently become undermined.

Term Limits for Congress Pros and Cons

There are several limits in term pros and cons which are apparent once the proposed amendment is consummated.

Some of the limits in a term for Congress pros and cons include:

1. Continuous development due to changes in leadership
2. Fewer tendencies for a family to establish a generation of a political dynasty and gaining too much power
3. Improved public service provided by an elected official

Despite these advantages, Congressional term limits also have some disadvantages such as:

1. Discontinuity of public projects due to changes in leadership
2. Frequent revisions in public documents

With these in mind, you should assess if the advantages of limits in a term in government outweigh the disadvantages of congressional term limits.

Advantages of Term Limits in Government

The Federal Constitution is faced with many issues including term limits in Congress. As we have discussed earlier, Congressional term limits have its fair share of pros and cons and now is the time to unite against monopolizing and playing with power and petition for a constitutional amendment. Highlight the advantages of limits in a term in the government and see how Congressional term limits can move our country to a higher post in the future.

One of the greatest motivations for the convention of the states is the need to reduce or limit the powers that the federal government has.

The government must implement fiscal restraints, and it should have a deadline for the members of Congress; this was the original foundation of the founding fathers of the US.

As a result, more states are already thinking about it, and there are those that also feel that more Republicans in the government need to amend the constitution of the US. The Republicans also believe that key conservative preferences needed to be locked first, because the chances of them controlling the government of the United States in future are pretty slim.

For the convention to take place, it is important to note that, the Constitution of the United States dictates that, for the

amendments to take effect, two-thirds of the state legislatures which forms 34 states needs to sign it. Once this is done, the government should ratify the amendments proposed by the Congress by three-quarters of the states which is about 38 states.  The number of states that were signed up for the convention is about nine, which is a growth towards the 34 states.  

The convention is a splendid thing; however, Congress is never too excited about the idea, this is because the last time a conference took place in 1787, wherein delegates met in Philadelphia to make amendments to the federal governing charter, the results were the creation of the current constitution.

It is important also to note that the different states have different laws that govern constitutional conventions.  The main differences include the following:

1.    Some states have the measure placed on the ballot papers, which happens after a period of about 10 to 20 years. In this case, the citizens of a state have a mandate to either approve or disapprove the Convention from taking place. The time varies with some states.
2.    In other states, the mandate of calling upon a convention solely lies with the legislature; this means that no consultations are made amongst the citizens.

3. 3.   In other states, the government will ask the opinion of the voters if they would want a convention to be called; this again is not the same across the board since there are measures that are put in place before this is done. The decision per state again varies to the following:

•    The number of legislatures concerning percentage that has to vote for the question to be included in the ballot box
•    The stated percentage of voters that must have approved for the constitutional convention once the item is included on the ballot paper
•    If the legislature has to vote for the question to place in a ballot box in more than one legislative seating

The last US elections that took place seem to bring more hope to the amendment taking place since 33 Republican governors were elected into office across the nation. The president equally supports the congressional term limits.

In the search for a lawyer it is vital to have a consultation before signing a contract to hire them for your case. During the consultation with a Chicago divorce lawyer you can get a great idea for how much the lawyer knows about the law, what their background is, and what part of the law the specialize in.

When doing research on Baizer Kolar P.C. you can go right to their website to learn a lot about the attorneys within the firm. Within the website you can see results of prior cases, contact information, request a free consultation and much more !

A body of rules of conduct of binding legal force and effect, prescribed, recognized, and enforced by controlling authority.
In U.S. law, the word law refers to any rule that if broken subjects a party to criminal punishment or civil liability. Laws in the United States are made by federal, state, and local legislatures, judges, the president, state governors, and administrative agencies.
Law in the United States is a mosaic of statutes, treaties, case law, Administrative Agency regulations, executive orders, and local laws. U.S. law can be bewildering because the laws of the various jurisdictions—federal, state, and local—are sometimes in conflict. Moreover, U.S. law is not static. New laws are regularly introduced, old laws are repealed, and existing laws are modified, so the precise definition of a particular law may be different in the future from what it is today.

Statutes and Treaties
After the federal Constitution, the highest laws are written laws, or statutes, passed by elected federal lawmakers. States have their own constitution and statutes.
Federal laws generally involve matters that concern the entire country. State laws generally do not reach beyond the borders of the state. Under Article VI, Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution, federal laws have supremacy over state and local laws. This means that when a state or local law conflicts with a federal law, the federal law prevails.
Federal statutes are passed by Congress and signed into law by the president. State statutes are passed by state legislatures and approved by the governor. If a president or governor vetoes, or rejects, a proposed law, the legislature may override the Veto if at least two-thirds of the members of each house of the legislature vote for the law.

Case Law
Statutes are the primary source of law, and the power to enact statutes is reserved to elected lawmakers. However, judicial decisions also have the force of law. Statutes do not cover every conceivable case, and even when a statute does control a case, the courts may need to interpret it. Judicial decisions are known collectively as case law. A judicial decision legally binds the parties in the case, and also may serve as a law in the same prospective sense as does a statute. In other words, a judicial decision determines the outcome of the particular case, and also may regulate future conduct of all persons within the jurisdiction of the court.

Common-Law Courts
Courts of law are a fundamental part of the U.S. judicial system. The U.S. Constitution and all state constitutions recognize a judicial branch of government that is charged with adjudicating disputes. Beginning in the 1990s, vigilante organizations challenged the judicial system by establishing their own so-called common-law courts. By 1996 these common-law courts existed in more than 30 states. Though they have no legitimate power, being created without either constitutional or statutory authority, and in fact sometimes contravene established law.

Agency Regulations and Executive Orders
Administrative agencies may also create laws. The federal and state constitutions implicitly give the legislatures the power to create administrative agencies. Administrative agencies are necessary because lawmakers often lack detailed knowledge about important issues, and they need experts to manage the regulation of complex subjects. On the federal level, for example, the Department of the Interior was created by Congress to manage the nation’s natural resources. In creating the agency, Congress gave it power to promulgate regulations concerning the use and protection of natural resources.

Local Laws
Counties, cities, and towns also have the authority to make laws. Local laws are issued by elected lawmakers and local administrative agencies. Local laws cannot conflict with state or federal laws. Decisions by local courts generally operate as law insofar as they apply to the participants in the case. To a lesser extent, local court decisions may have a prospective effect. That is, a local court decision can operate as precedent, but only in cases brought within the same jurisdiction. For example, a court decision argued by an attorney in Springfield, Missouri may affect future court cases in Greene County, but it has no bearing on the law in any other county. Local laws can be found in local courthouses, in local libraries, and in state government libraries. Local laws may also be accessed via the World Wide Web.

CONVENTION

Contracts, Civil Law. A general term which comprehends all kinds of contracts, treaties, pacts or agreements. It is defined to be the consent of two or more persons to form with each other an engagement, or to dissolve or change one which they had previously formed.

Legislation. This term is applied to a selecting of the delegates elected by the people for other purposes than usual legislation. It is mostly used to denote all assembly to make or amend the constitution of a state, but it sometimes indicates an assembly of the delegates of the people to nominate officers to be supported at an election.

EU law is divided into ‘primary’ and ‘secondary’ legislation. The treaties (primary legislation) are the basis or ground rules for all EU action.

Secondary legislation – which includes regulations, directives and decisions – are derived from the principles and objectives set out in the treaties.

The European Union is a unique economic and political union between 28 European countries that together cover much of the continent.

The EU was created in the aftermath of the Second World War. The first steps were to foster economic cooperation: the idea being that countries that trade with one another become economically interdependent and so more likely to avoid conflict.

The result was the European Economic Community (EEC), created in 1958, and initially increasing economic cooperation between six countries: Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. Since then, a huge single market has been created and continues to develop towards its full potential.

Human rights and equality

One of the EU’s main goals is to promote human rights both internally and around the world. Human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights: these are the core values of the EU. Since the Lisbon Treaty’s entry in force in 2009, the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights brings all these rights together in a single document. The EU’s institutions are legally bound to uphold them, as are EU governments whenever they apply EU law.

Transparent and democratic institutions

The enlarged EU remains focused on making its governing institutions more transparent and democratic. More powers have been given to the directly elected European Parliament, while national parliaments play a greater role, working alongside the European institutions. In turn, European citizens have an ever-increasing number of channels for taking part in the political process.